Bar serves a minor. One of the defenses that we hear a lot is, “Well, the person had a fake ID.” Well, if it’s true, that could be a valid defense because a bar is only held accountable for selling to a minor if they knew that the person was a minor. If the person had a fantastic fake ID that would have fooled somebody at an airport, then the bar’s probably not going to be held responsible. Think about it, how often does that really happen? I mean, what are we dealing with, Jason Bourne who’s got like, 58 different Ids? No. You’re dealing with some kid who got somebody else’s license and changed a number or used a color copier to try to make a license. If you’ve got something that anybody would know is a fake, which is usually the situation, that’s not going to be a good defense.
Service ' Ingesting R Production A fit Video amp;d Update 'as Cloud Bbc Like this:
Like
Loading...
Related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1KIMyGvQuQ What do you have to prove as far as when a drunk driver leaves a bar or restaurant, they hit somebody and hurt somebody? You don't have to prove that they were visibly intoxicated at the time that they were over-served. You got to prove one of two things: Either,…
In "Dram Shop"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HAIqAe8NDco Bars, restaurants, convenience stores, grocery stores, anybody can be held accountable if they knowingly give alcohol to minors, so if they sell alcohol to a minor, somebody sells alcohol to a minor and they know that person's a minor, they're going to be held accountable for that. That's a…
In "Dram Shop"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hK2YaTiUmtA Defenses in liquor liability cases. Where there's the usual defenses that you see in any kind of case, "It wasn't me. I didn't do it. I have no idea what happened. Somebody made the whole thing up." You are almost always going to get that. Once you get past…
In "Dram Shop"
